History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peeples v. Peeples
19 Ill. 269
Ill.
1857
Check Treatment
Breese, J.

The question in this case is as to the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Coles county.

The record shows that complainant was a resident of Edgar county when the bill was filed, and the defendant a resident of Hancock county, to which the process was sent from Coles. The domicil of both parties when living together, and at the time of abandonment by defendant, was Coles county.

The defendant appeared to the suit and filed his answer, and submitted his defense on the merits. No objection was made to the jurisdiction of the court until after trial and verdict, when a motion was made to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction.

The Circuit Courts have general jurisdiction of the subject of divorces, and the defendant in this case voluntarily submitted to the jurisdiction over his person.

The objection being of a dilatory character, should have been made before trial, by motion or by plea in abatement — answering to the merits, waives the objection. Gillilan v. Gray, 14 Ill. R. 416.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Decree affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Peeples v. Peeples
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 15, 1857
Citation: 19 Ill. 269
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.