History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peebles v. State
104 So. 924
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

It could serve no good purpose to recite the evidence as shown by the record. After an examination of the entire evidence, we are of the opinion that the defendant was not entitled to the general affirmative charge. The rulings of the court upon the admission of testimony were also without error. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Peebles v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 7, 1925
Citation: 104 So. 924
Docket Number: 8 Div. 313.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.