Pedreira v. PedreiraPedreira v. Pedreira
The trial court‘s finding that awarding custody of the parties’ daughter to defendant father would be in the child‘s best
Although plaintiff contends that certain property should have been treated as separate and shielded from equitable distribution, she did not carry her burden (see DeJesus v DeJesus, 90 NY2d 643, 648 [1997]; Kurtz v Kurtz, 1 AD3d 214 [2003]) to demonstrate that the property at issue was in fact separate.
The trial court correctly imposed certain conditions on plaintiff‘s participation in the sale of the marital residence, in particular upon plaintiff‘s ability to bid at the sale, given her dilatory conduct throughout the prior proceedings.
We have considered plaintiff‘s remaining points and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.