A-8616 | Tex. | Oct 18, 1961
PECOS VALLEY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
PARKHILL PRODUCE COMPANY, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Kleberg, Mobley, Lockett & Weil, Corpus Christi, Russell & Tomlin, Pecos, for petitioner.
Ward & Brown, Corpus Christi, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We are in agreement with the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case, 348 S.W.2d 208" court="Tex. App." date_filed="1961-06-14" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/parkhill-produce-co-v-pecos-valley-southern-railway-co-1684532?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1684532">348 S.W.2d 208, upon the points wherein there is conflict with the 1897 decision of the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals in First National Bank v. East, 17 Tex.Civ. *724 App. 176, 43 S.W. 558" court="Tex. App." date_filed="1897-11-11" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/first-national-bank-v-east-3970515?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3970515">43 S.W. 558. See Middlebrook v. David Bradley Manufacturing Company, 86 Tex. 706" court="Tex." date_filed="1894-05-21" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/middlebrook--brother-v-david-bradley-manufacturing-co-3982661?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3982661">86 Tex. 706, 26 S.W. 935" court="Tex." date_filed="1894-05-14" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/sullivan-v-miller-3950193?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3950193">26 S.W. 935; Warner v. Gohlman, Lester & Co., 117 Tex. 145" court="Tex." date_filed="1927-10-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/warner-v-gohlman-lester-co-inc-3970185?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3970185">117 Tex. 145, 298 S.W. 890; Id. Tex.Civ.App., 8 S.W.2d 1049" court="Tex. App." date_filed="1927-03-31" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/warner-v-gohlman-lester--co-3962267?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3962267">8 S.W.2d 1049; Stevens v. Willson, 120 Tex. 584" court="Tex." date_filed="1931-06-10" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/stevens-v-willson-3979150?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3979150">120 Tex. 584, 39 S.W.2d 1088; Shafer v. Brashear, Tex.Civ.App., 274 S.W. 229" court="Tex. App." date_filed="1925-06-10" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/shafer-v-brashear-3934048?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3934048">274 S.W. 229; Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Association of El Paso v. Anderson, Tex.Civ.App., 88 S.W.2d 499" court="Tex. App." date_filed="1935-10-31" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/mutual-federal-savings--loan-assn-of-el-paso-v-anderson-3906971?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3906971">88 S.W.2d 499; Wolcott v. Hall, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 1140" court="Tex. App." date_filed="1937-12-10" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/wolcott-v-hall-3923005?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3923005">111 S.W.2d 1140; Dickson v. Klett, Tex.Civ.App., 211 S.W.2d 381" court="Tex. App." date_filed="1948-04-29" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/dickson-v-klett-3907466?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3907466">211 S.W.2d 381, mand. overr., 1 McDonald, Civil Procedure, 420, § 4.38. In accordance with the provisions of Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.