History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peck v. Whitaker
103 Pa. 297
Pa.
1883
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was filed

Pee Cukiam.

It is trne a sheriff out of office cannot amend his return so as to defeat an action brought against him for damages. That rule does not apply to the facts in this case. Here the sheriff is merely the legal plaintiff in the action ; but it is solely for the benefit of the lien creditors entitled to the fund : Tindle’s Appeal, 27 P. F. Smith 201. The money, however, is not to be distributed on the trial of this cause. After the recovery is had, and due notice to all, claiming to share in the fund, a distribution will be made. They are not parties to this suit, and the precise quantum of their shares are not to be determined now. The amendment was properly allowed. The statute of limitations qualifying the effect thereof was not interposed as a plea. We see no error in the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Peck v. Whitaker
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 23, 1883
Citation: 103 Pa. 297
Docket Number: No. 57
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.