History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peck v. Stephens
35 Okla. 468
Okla.
1913
Check Treatment

The sufficiency of the purported case-made in the above-entitled proceeding in error, to support the petition in error, is challenged in a motion to dismiss on the ground, among others, that neither the case-made nor a certified copy thereof was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court. The order from which the appeal was sought to be taken was rendered on the 1st day of April, 1912.

The motion must be sustained; the rule being that the case-made, or a copy thereof, must be filed with the papers in the case in the court below, or it is a nullity, and cannot be considered in this court for the purpose of reviewing matters complained of in the trial court. See Abbott v. Rodgers, ante,128 P. 908, and cases cited therein.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Peck v. Stephens
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Feb 11, 1913
Citation: 35 Okla. 468
Docket Number: 4417
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.