History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peck v. Phillips
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 113
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1800
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The allowance of costs in this case does not depend on any statute, but upon the rules and practice of the court, merely. It is, of course, *114discretionary. As the tenant is strictly entitled to judgment as in cases of nonsuit, and the demandant, to avoid it, applies for the benefit of another rule of court, by offering to stipulate to try his action at the next circuit, we think we ought to impose on him the terms of paying the costs already accrued, for not proceeding to trial according to his notice. We ought not to grant him a favour, .by allowing him to make this stipulation, and thereby escape the consequence of his default, without requiring him to reinstate the opposite party, and place him in the condition he was, by paying costs.

Motion granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Peck v. Phillips
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 15, 1800
Citation: 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 113
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.