Peck, Stow & Wilcox Co. v. Fray
92 F. 1021 | 2d Cir. | 1898
It would seem that the patent, if sustainable at all, must
be construed as an extremely narrow one. Manifestly, defendant’s device is not a Chinese copy of complainant’s, and appellant has introduced sufficient evidence of the prior art, as disclosed in patents, to overcome the presumption