History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pebley v. District Attorney
107 F. Supp. 838
N.D.W. Va.
1952
Check Treatment
WATKINS, District Judge.

Petitioner has filed what he calls a petition for a “Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum.” He states that he is now a prisoner in the State Penitentiary at Moundsville, serving a 10-year sentence, and that a detainer, from Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, has been filed against him, charging auto theft. He wants a, speedy trial of the North Carolina charge, and asks this Court for an order of removal.

The‘petition must be dismissed for the following reasons: (1) Lack of jurisdiction; (2) If petitioner wants a speedy trial, he should address that request to the North Carolina state authorities. He has not exhausted state remedies; (3) The petition does not state a cause of action.

The petition may be filed, and then dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Pebley v. District Attorney
Court Name: District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Date Published: Oct 15, 1952
Citation: 107 F. Supp. 838
Docket Number: No. 610-W
Court Abbreviation: N.D.W. Va.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.