Appellant was tried before a jury on an indictment which charged him with one count of child molestation and one count of incest. He was found guilty as to both counts. Appellant appeals from the judgments of conviction and sentences entered on the jury’s verdict.
1. Appellant enumerates the trial court’s denial of his motion for directed verdict as to the child molestation charge. Appellant urges that his motion should have been granted because the State’s evidence failed to show that he had committed an act of child molestation against the victim within the applicable statute of limitations.
The crime of child molestation is a felony, and prosecution must be commenced within four years after commission of the crime. OCGA §§ 16-6-4; 17-3-1 (c). A prosecution commences with the return of an indictment, not with the onset of trial.
Hall v. Hopper,
2. Appellant enumerates the denial of his motion for directed verdict of acquittal on the charge of incest, urging that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support a conviction of that crime. However, our review of the record shows sufficient evidence, including out-of-court statements of the victim admissible under
Gibbons v. State,
Judgments affirmed.
