History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pease v. Gleason
8 Johns. 409
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1811
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The adjournment was no serious inconvenience, and it rested in the discretion of the justice, which was not abused in this case. There is no evidence of it. The proof of the absence of the party satisfied the justice, and that was sufficient.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Pease v. Gleason
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1811
Citation: 8 Johns. 409
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.