History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pease v. Allas
110 Mass. 157
Mass.
1872
Check Treatment
Chapman, C. J.

By the Gen. Sts. e. 92, § 6, a will must be subscribed by three or more competent witnesses. They must be competent at the time of the attestation of the will. By the common law, it was a settled principle that husbands and wives could not in any case be admitted as witnesses for or against each other, independently of the question of interest. None of our statutes have changed the rule in this respect as to the attestation of wills, and the rule applies to such attestation. Davis v. Dinwoody, 4 T. R. 678. Hatfield v. Thorp, 5 B. & Ald. 589. Sullivan v. Sullivan, 106 Mass. 474.

*158As the wife of the testator in this case was not a competent witness when the will was executed, his death did not make her competent. Decree affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Pease v. Allas
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1872
Citation: 110 Mass. 157
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.