History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pearson v. Gregg
575 So. 2d 333
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Willie M. Pearson, the defendant below in a personal injury action arising from an automobile accident, appeals a jury verdict finding her guilty of negligence, and awarding the appellee $22,000 economic and noneconomic damages. We affirm the finding of negligence, but reverse the damage award. As a threshold matter the appellee was required to prove under § 627.737(2)(b), Fla.Stat. that she had sustained a permanent injury within a reasonable degree of medical probability as a prerequisite to any recovery of noneconomic damages. The medical evidence adduced failed to satisfy this requirement. Further, there was no evidence to demonstrate ap-pellee has or will sustain any economic damage as a result of the accident. Accordingly, the trial court erred in not granting the defense motion for directed verdict *334on the issues of damages, and the award is REVERSED.

NIMMONS, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Pearson v. Gregg
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 7, 1991
Citation: 575 So. 2d 333
Docket Number: No. 90-1772
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.