History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pearsall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
97 N.Y.S. 1143
N.Y. App. Div.
1906
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order afirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that ividence of the meaning and application of the ule relating to junctions was improperly ex-luded.

Case Details

Case Name: Pearsall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 28, 1906
Citation: 97 N.Y.S. 1143
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.