107 N.H. 197 | N.H. | 1966
Petition for an injunction and a writ of habeas corpus “commanding the State of New Hampshire and the New Hampshire State Parole Board to withdraw and dismiss their warrant and or detainer for parole violation on the grounds . . . that they have lost all jurisdiction over said petitioner.”
By statute the State Board of Parole retains “the legal custody of all prisoners released upon parole until they receive their discharge or are remanded to prison.” RSA 607:31; Tsoukalas v. Hancock, 102 N. H. 417, 421. The State does not automatically waive, relinquish or forfeit its “legal custody” of a parolee by his subsequent conviction in another jurisdiction. Jurczyszyn v. Michigan Parole Board, 316 Mich. 529; Hunt v. Hand, 186 Kan. 670; People v. Ragen, 400 Ill. 191. The plaintiff, by leaving this state in violation of his unexpired parole, cannot convert his subsequent convictions and confinements in other state prisons and a federal penitentiary into a waiver of this State’s jurisdiction to enforce a warrant for a violation of parole. Herbert v. New Hampshire State Parole Board, 106 N. H. 401; Annot. 147 A.L.R. 941, 943; State v. Granquist, (Minn.) 135 N. W. 2d 447 (1965).
Petition dismissed.