History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pearce v. McClanahan
50 Mo. 267
Mo.
1872
Check Treatment
Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action by attachment. After commencing their suit plaintiffs filed an amended.petition, and the defendant filed a motion to strike it out, which motion was sustained and a bill of exceptions filed. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error, because there was no final judgment. The action of the Circuit Court in sustaining the motion to strike out was not a final judgment from which a writ of error lies.

The writ of error is dismissed.

The other judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Pearce v. McClanahan
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Jul 15, 1872
Citation: 50 Mo. 267
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.