History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith
457 S.E.2d 599
N.C.
1995
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Justice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Peal Ex Rel. Peal v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 2, 1995
Citation: 457 S.E.2d 599
Docket Number: 398PA94
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.