Peake v. Fuller
123 Mich. 684 | Mich. | 1900
The facts in this case are like the facts in Peake v. Yule, ante, 675 (82 N. W. 514), and that case is controlling of the present, except one other question is here raised. It is claimed by the defendant that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. We think
The judgment must be affirmed.