History
  • No items yet
midpage
(PC) Lumpkin v. Agredano
2:18-cv-03270
E.D. Cal.
Aug 30, 2019
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SYLVESTER LUMPKIN, No. 2: 18-cv-3270 JAM KJN P Plaintiff,

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS R. A. AGREDANO,

Defendant.

By an order filed March 27, 2019, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time /////

/////

1

*2 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 30, 2019

Lump3270.fusm

2

Case Details

Case Name: (PC) Lumpkin v. Agredano
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Aug 30, 2019
Docket Number: 2:18-cv-03270
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.