Sign In to View Projects
History
  • No items yet
midpage
(PC) Holmes v. Cardoza
2:24-cv-02190
| E.D. Cal. | May 19, 2025
Case Information

*1 Case 2:24-cv-02190-WBS-JDP Document 13 Filed 05/19/25 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DOMINIQUE HOLMES, Case No. 2:24-cv-2190-WBS-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER N. CARDOZA, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 24, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. [1]

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY *2 Case 2:24-cv-02190-WBS-JDP Document 13 Filed 05/19/25 Page 2 of 2 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 24, 2025, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion to reopen this action, ECF No. 11, is DENIED.

Dated: May 16, 2025 2

NOTES

[1] Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1

AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.