(PC) Dobbs v. Jacob(PC) Dobbs v. Jacob
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE
Dylan Dobbs seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, related to his contraction of and treatment for COVID-19 while a pretrial detainee at Madera County Jail. (See generally Doc. 14.) The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff‘s amended complaint and found he failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 15.) Although granted more than three months to file an amended complaint, Plaintiff failed to do so. (See Docs. 18, 20.)
The magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations, incorporating the findings of the Screening Order and recommending dismissal for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 22 at 2-7, 9.) The magistrate judge also found Plaintiff failed to prosecute this action and failed to comply with the Court‘s orders, and terminating sanctions were appropriate for these failures. (Id. at 7-9.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed with prejudice. (Id. at 9.)
According to
- The Findings and Recommendations issued on July 29, 2026 (Doc. 22) are ADOPTED in full.
- This action is DISMISSED with prejudice for Plaintiff‘s failure to state a claim, failure to obey a court order, and failure to prosecute.
- The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 1, 2026
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE