63 Tenn. 583 | Tenn. | 1874
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an action on the case brought by plaintiff against defendants for enticing away plaintiff’s wife and pursuading and procuring her to abandon him. Verdict and judgment were for defendants, and plain-iff has appealed. Plaintiff’s wife is the daughter of
The only questions arising in this Court are upon the correctness of the charge of the Court and upon his refusal to charge as requested by the plaintiff. The Court charged the jury that “where a minor child, especially if very young, marries without consent of her .parents and against their wishes, they
It is next objected that the Court instructed the jury that they might consider, upon the questions of damages, whether the plaintiff entertained a sincere and
The plaintiff further insists that the Court erred in refusing to charge his eleventh proposition without more or additional statements. Although we are of opinion that the proposition submitted was correct, as stated by the Court to the jury, and might very properly have been left to them without particular reference to other facts in evidence; yet, we cannot say that there was any error in the reference made by the Judge to other aspects of the case, as presented by the counsel for defendants, for which we would reverse.
Upon the whole case, the record shows that there was sufficient evidence before the jury to warrant the conclusions at which they arrived; and being of opinion that the charge of the Court is correct, we affirm the judgment.