Payne v. State
498 So. 2d 413 | Fla. | 1986
Lead Opinion
This is a petition to review Payne v. State, 480 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), in which the district court held that the trial court did not err in considering Payne’s habitual offender status as a reason for departure from sentencing guidelines. We find conflict with Whitehead v. State, 498
It is so ordered.
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissent in Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986).