History
  • No items yet
midpage
Payne v. Peninsula School Dist.
621 F.3d 1001
| 9th Cir. | 2010
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
621 F.3d 1001 (2010)

Windy PAYNE, individually and as guardian on behalf of; D.P., a minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal corporation; Artondale Elementary School, a municipal corporation; Jodi Coy, in her individual *1002 and official capacity; James Coolican, in his individual and official capacity; Jane Does 1-10; John Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-35115.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 7, 2010.

Thomas Brian Vertelis, Esquire, Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, LLP, Tacoma, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Donald F. Austin, Esquire, Michael A. Patterson, Esquire, Patterson Buchanan Fobes Leitch & Kalzer, Inc., PS, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Prior report: 598 F.3d 1123.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Case Details

Case Name: Payne v. Peninsula School Dist.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 7, 2010
Citation: 621 F.3d 1001
Docket Number: 07-35115
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.