Paulk v. State, 116 Ga. 515

Paulk v. State

116 Ga. 515 | Ga. | 1902

Little, J.

1.. It does not appear that the trial judge committed any error for the causes assigned in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2.- The finding by the jury that the accused was guilty of the offense of voluntary manslaughter was fully authorized hy the evidence. Therefore the trial judge committed no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent, and Candler, J., not presiding.