Paul v. WallacePaul v. Wallace
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Onondaga County Family Court for further
In October 1994 petitioner sought to regain custody of her daughter, alleging in her petition that she had complied with the terms of the April 1994 order. In a second petition, filed in November 1994, petitioner alleged that respondent had violated that order by making negative comments about petitioner and limiting her visitation.
Family Court properly dismissed the second petition. The proof at trial failed to substantiate the allegations of that petition.
With respect to the October 1994 petition, however, the court erred in finding that extraordinary circumstances warranted continued custody with respondent, based entirely upon the April 1994 stipulation. That stipulation, by itself, does not constitute extraordinary circumstances (see, Matter of Michael G. B. v Angela L. B.,