History
  • No items yet
midpage
Patton v. Pearson Church
168 Pa. 321
Pa.
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The able argument of the learned gentleman who represents the appellants has not persuaded us that the interpretation of the will of Gaylord Church on the trial in the court below was erroneous. The reasons given in support of his ruling by the learned trial judge are so satisfactory to us that we affirm the judgment on the opinion filed on the disposition of the reserved question.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Patton v. Pearson Church
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 20, 1895
Citation: 168 Pa. 321
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 50
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.