History
  • No items yet
midpage
Patton v. Patton
2 Pennyp. 394
Pa.
1882
Check Treatment
— Per Curiam:

Ve concur fully in the opinion of the learned judge of the Court below, as expressed in his charge to the jury, that this was a personal contract, not binding on the executors of the husband.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Patton v. Patton
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 1, 1882
Citation: 2 Pennyp. 394
Docket Number: No. 275
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.