Thе appellant, Jerry Patterson, appeals from his convictions for malice murder and
1. The victim, 86-year-old Gladys Windsor, lived by herself in a trailer park. On Monday morning, May 29, 2000, her son, William Windsor, found her dead in her mobile home. A medical examiner detеrmined that Ms. Windsor died from several stab wounds from a knife. Two investigating officers testified that William Windsor told them that his mother was in good health; that she generally kept large sums of cash in a bank envelope in her purse; and that she should have had about $802 from her Sоcial Security check on the day she died. The officers found neither the victim’s purse nor any money in her mobile home. William Windsоr died of a heart attack before trial and thus was unable to testify. William’s wife, however, testified that Gladys Windsor collected $802 frоm Social Security each month. She also testified that William would take her to the hank to cash her Social Security check and that he had taken Gladys Windsor to the bank on the Friday before she was found dead.
On May 28, 2000, Patterson was living with his brother and his brother’s girlfriend, Trina Watkins. As of that date, Patterson had been living with his brother and Ms. Watkins for several weeks. Ms. Watkins testified that she had never seen Patterson with any money. She also added that she, Patterson, and Patterson’s brother needed money for a hotel room because the water in Ms. Watkins’s home had been turned off. On the morning of Sunday, May 28, 2000, Patterson left Ms. Watkins’s home, stating that he was going to find some work to earn some money for them.
A resident of the trailer park in which Gladys Windsor lived testified that she saw Patterson at Gladys Windsor’s home between 8:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. on May 28. The witness stated that Patterson attempted to get money from Windsor, but that she would not open her door. However, she told him to return later. The witness testified that she saw Patterson at various times throughout the remainder of the morning and afternoon walking around the trailer park, asking for money in exchange for doing yard work or taking out the trash. The witness last saw Patterson in the trailer park around 5:00 p.m.
Trina Watkins testified that Patterson returned home around 5:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Patterson gave her some money and was counting a stack of about $800 in cash. Watkins asked Patterson where he had gotten the money, and he replied that a lady he had done some work for went into the bathroom and left the money on her table in a bank envelope. He told her that he picked up the envelope and walked out the door. Patterson then gave Watkins $222 for a hotel rоom and left the home.
Another resident of the trailer park testified that he knew Patterson, and that, about 9:00 p.m. on May 28, he was рarked in his van on a street near the trailer park and saw Patterson walking down the street. The witness added that Patterson offеred to pay him $15 if the witness would drive Patterson to a hotel that was approximately a quarter of a mile from where they wеre talking. The
In a statement that Patterson gave to the police, 2 he admitted that he worked for the victim on the day of her death and that she paid him $20, but he denied that he harmed her. In his statement, Patterson stated that he еmptied the victim’s kitchen trash can for her, but one of the investigating officers testified that the kitchen trash can was full on the morning оf May 29 when he arrived at the victim’s home to investigate her death.
Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to thе verdict, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found Patterson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt оf the crimes for which he was convicted. 3
2. Patterson contends that the statements made by William Windsor to the two investigating officеrs were inadmissible under Crawford v. Washington, 4 and that the trial court erred in permitting the two officers to testify to those statements. However, because Patterson did not object to the statements on Sixth Amendment grounds at trial, he is procedurally barred from raising this issue on apрeal. 5
3. Patterson also contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence that he attempted to stаb another inmate with a homemade knife while in prison. We conclude, however, that, even if the trial court erred in admitting evidence of the independent crime, the error was harmless given the strength of the evidence against Patterson. 6
Judgment affirmed.
Notes
The crimes occurred on May 28,2000. On July 14,2000, Patterson was indicted for malice murder, three counts of felony murder, armed robbery, aggravated assault, and burglary On March 28, 2001, this Court granted an application for interlocutory appeal filed by Patterson, and on February 4, 2002, this Court rulеd, among other things, that the trial court erred in failing to suppress Patterson’s confession to the crime,
Patterson v. State,
This statement was not excluded from evidence by our prior decision in this case.
Patterson,
Jackson v. Virginia,
Walton v. State,
McGee v. State,