| Mich. | Apr 29, 1874
held that the adjournment in question was in legal effect an adjournment at the request, or at least by the consent, of the defendant, and one therefore of which he will not be heard to complain.
Judgment reversed.
held that the adjournment in question was in legal effect an adjournment at the request, or at least by the consent, of the defendant, and one therefore of which he will not be heard to complain.
Judgment reversed.