History
  • No items yet
midpage
Patrick v. Patrick
30 Del. 75
Del. Super. Ct.
1918
Check Treatment
Per Curam:

We think; that petitions in divorce proceedings, and answers when necessary, are the pleadings in those cases, and we see no reason why the court should not, in its discretion, allow an answer to be withdrawn and other action taken. Of course, if it were apparent that this course was being pursued for the purpose of delaying the hearing of the case, that would be a matter for the court to pass upon, but that question is not raised in this case.

We think we should allow the answer to be withdrawn at this time.

Case Details

Case Name: Patrick v. Patrick
Court Name: Superior Court of Delaware
Date Published: Feb 4, 1918
Citation: 30 Del. 75
Docket Number: Alias Divorce, No. 19; No. 53
Court Abbreviation: Del. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.