History
  • No items yet
midpage
Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Co.
198 So. 2d 825
Fla.
1967
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have been asked to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in the case of Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company, 185 So.2d 522.

The petition reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court and we issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the decisions relied upon by the Petitioner present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., DREW, J., and Mc-MULLEN, Circuit Judge, dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: May 17, 1967
Citation: 198 So. 2d 825
Docket Number: No. 35477
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.