123 Mich. 203 | Mich. | 1900
(after stating the facts).
“But it is evident that there are great objections to any general interference by courts with awards. They are*207 made by a tribunal of the parties’ own selection, who are usually, at least, expected to act on their own view of law and testimony, more freely and less technically than courts and regular juries. They are also generally expected to frame their decisions on broad views of justice, which may sometimes deviate from the strict rules of law. It is not expected that, after resorting to such private tribunals, either party may repudiate their action and fall back on the courts.” Port Huron, etc., R. Co. v. Callanan, 61 Mich. 26 (34 N. W. 678).
Having agreed to submit to this tribunal all matters in ■ controversy, neither party can now come into court and by ex parte affidavits establish what it was agreed should or should not be submitted.
We have examined the other points raised against the award, and do not find them valid.