History
  • No items yet
midpage
Patricia Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc.
689 F. App'x 758
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monique Antonia Miles, OLD TOWNE ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Emily Crandall Harlan, NIXON PEABODY LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Leviege appeals the district court’s orders granting Vodafone US Inc.’s (Vodafone) motion to dismiss Leviege’s employment discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims against Vodafone, and denying Leviege’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the dismissal order. We have considered the parties’ arguments and have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc. , No. 1:16-cv- 00374-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016 & Nov. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Patricia Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 25, 2017
Citation: 689 F. App'x 758
Docket Number: 16-2413
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.