History
  • No items yet
midpage
Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R.
52 Cal. 90
Cal.
1877
Check Treatment
By the Court :

The verdict, in so far as it awarded damages “in United States gold coin,” was unwarranted, and this clause should have *91been disregarded in entering the judgment. ( Watson v. S. F. & H. B. R. R. Co. 50 Cal. 523.) We find no other error in the record.

Judgment and order affirmed, except in so far as the judgment requires payment in gold coin, and the case is remanded, with instructions to the Court below to modify the judgment in accordance with this opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R.
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1877
Citation: 52 Cal. 90
Docket Number: No. 4935
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.