Diane Barker PATIN, F/K/a Diane Barker, Appellant,
v.
Carl A. POPINO, the Estate of Carl A. Popino, Phyllis T. Popino, Randy Rose, Richard Carmel and Rocco A. Delmonaco, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*436 Greene & Cooper and Robyn Greene, Miami, for appellant.
Ramon David Feliu, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The order denying the appellant's motion under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 to vacate an order impressing an attorney's charging lien on the appellant's home is reversed. Even assuming, arguendo, that the appellees were entitled to recover attorneys' fees for their labors on the appellant's behalf in the underlying litigation, that litigation terminated with a final judgment of foreclosure in appellant's favor in January 1982, in which jurisdiction was reserved to enter "further orders as are proper, including, without limitation, Writs of Assistance and deficiency judgments," but not to make a post-judgment award of attorneys' fees, much less to declare a lien for the amount awarded. See Frumkes v. Frumkes,
Reversed, with directions.
