History
  • No items yet
midpage
131 A. 870
N.J.
1926
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — ISTone.

Case Details

Case Name: Pathe Exchange v. Court of Common Pleas of Hudson Cty
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 1, 1926
Citations: 131 A. 870; 102 N.J.L. 443; 1926 N.J. LEXIS 193
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Pathe Exchange v. Court of Common Pleas of Hudson Cty, 131 A. 870