Pate v. StatePate v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Luke
Luke, J.
The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction, and there is no merit in the special assignments of error.,
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, 0. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.
The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction, and there is no merit in the special assignments of error.,
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, 0. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.