History
  • No items yet
midpage
Patchin v. Parkhurst
9 Wend. 443
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1832
Check Treatment
By the Court.

Until the revised statutes, the practice, it is believed, has been, whore a party was entitled to recover double or treble costs, to double or treble the amount of the common costs, and certify the bill accordingly. The legislature have now defined what they mean by allowing double costs, viz. the common costs and one half thereof in addition, adopting the mode of computation common in England. The samo principle applied to treble costs, entitles the party, 1. To common costs; 2. To half of these and then ixaif of the latter, or seventy five per cent, added to the common costs. There must therefore be a relaxation in this cause.

Case Details

Case Name: Patchin v. Parkhurst
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1832
Citation: 9 Wend. 443
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.