History
  • No items yet
midpage
Passera v. Pontchartrain Realty Co.
284 U.S. 573
SCOTUS
1931
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash Ry. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Case Details

Case Name: Passera v. Pontchartrain Realty Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 19, 1931
Citation: 284 U.S. 573
Docket Number: No. 136
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.