Partridge v. Powell

Jan 25, 1897
Appeal, No. 316
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Dean
Per Curiam,

There appears to be nothing ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‍in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‍the specifications.

For reasons given by the learned president of the common pleas, ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‍we are all of opinion that the service of the writ ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‍of summons was rightly set aside. There is nothing in the ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‍case that requires special notice.

Judgment affirmed.