History
  • No items yet
midpage
Partridge v. Powell
180 Pa. 22
Pa.
1897
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

There appears to be nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications.

For reasons given by the learned president of the common pleas, we are all of opinion that the service of the writ of summons was rightly set aside. There is nothing in the case that requires special notice.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Partridge v. Powell
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 25, 1897
Citation: 180 Pa. 22
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 316
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.