Parone v. RiversParone v. Rivers
Judgment unanimously modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff, an attorney, brought this action for legal fees which he claimed were owed under an alleged modification of a retainer agreement with defendants who comprise the Town Board óf the Town of Niagara. Defendants counterclaimed to recover alleged overpayment. After a nonjury trial, judgment was awarded to defendants on their counterclaim and plaintiff appealed. In reviewing findings of fact in a nonjury trial, the record should be viewed in a light most favorable to sustain the judgment, due deference should be accorded Trial Term in matters of credibility and the findings of fact should not.be disturbed unless such determination could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the facts (Matter of Dearmyer v Clark,