History
  • No items yet
midpage
Parmenter v. State
412 So. 2d 935
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1982
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant raises for the first time on appeal the issue of whether his sentence is illegal under Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1981). Because Villery suggests that this issue be brought to the attention of the trial court in the first instance, we do not consider it on this appeal. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s raising this issue in the trial court by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Parmenter v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 16, 1982
Citation: 412 So. 2d 935
Docket Number: No. 81-276
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.