Parmelee v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
246 U.S. 658 | SCOTUS | 1918
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with *659costs upon, the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.
Mr. Arthur E. -Griffin and Mr. Thomas B. McMariin for plaintiff in error.Mr. Neman H. Field for defendant in error.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.