History
  • No items yet
midpage
Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Angell
99 Wis. 297
Wis.
1898
Check Treatment
Marshall, J.

The sole question presented is whether the* trial court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury as not warranted by the evidence. The rule that the determination of the trial court on such a question cannot be disturbed on appeal, if there is any credible evidence, to support the finding of the jury, is too familiar to justify a discussion of it at this time. Testing the verdict by the. record; in the light of such rule, we are unable to discover any warrant for a reversal of the judgment.

By the Court.— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Angell
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 12, 1898
Citation: 99 Wis. 297
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.