History
  • No items yet
midpage
Parkview Hospital v. Hospital Service Assn.
222 N.E.2d 314
Ohio Ct. App.
1966
Check Treatment
Dueeey, J.

Appellant, Parkview Hospital, has filed a motion for reconsideration.

Insofar as the motion requests the court to reverse its conclusions on the merits (7 Ohio App. 2d 111) of appellant’s claims, we find the motion should be overruled.

Appellant also complains at some length with respect to the alleged uncertainty and ambiguity of the syllabus attached to the published opinion of the court.

The Supreme Court of Ohio has for many years followed a unique theory that the syllabus of one of its cases expresses the court’s conclusions as to the law. No such doctrine or rule has ever been followed by the Courts of Appeals. In those courts, as in all other courts, the opinion expresses the court’s reasoning. There is no official syllabus. The syllabus prepared for the official publication in the Ohio Bar is merely a synopsis provided for the convenience of attorneys and others.

The motion for reconsideration will be overruled.

Motion overruled.

Bryant, P. J., concurs. Dueey, J., dissents on the merits.

Case Details

Case Name: Parkview Hospital v. Hospital Service Assn.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 13, 1966
Citation: 222 N.E.2d 314
Docket Number: 7942
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In