History
  • No items yet
midpage
Parker v. State
24 Ga. App. 158
Ga. Ct. App.
1919
Check Treatment
Broyles, P. J.

Conceding, but not deciding, that the lard-can found in the defendant’s house was an apparatus for the distilling and manufacturing of whisky, within the meaning- of section 22 of the act of the General Assembly approved March 28, 1917 (Acts 1917, Ex. Sess., p. 18), the undisputed evidence showed that the lard-can had been brought to the house and left there in the defendant’s absence, and had been there only a few hours when found by the officers, and that although the defendant was present in the house when it was found, he had not been told and did not know of its presence. It follows that his conviction was unauthorized, and the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Parker v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 23, 1919
Citation: 24 Ga. App. 158
Docket Number: 10596
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.