History
  • No items yet
midpage
Parkening v. Arnold
148 F.2d 210
9th Cir.
1945
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We see no reason why the character of the judgment as based on the fraud of appellant as determined by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, should be relitigated in this bankruptcy proceeding.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Parkening v. Arnold
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 24, 1945
Citation: 148 F.2d 210
Docket Number: No. 10857
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.