History
  • No items yet
midpage
Parise v. Pepe
59 N.Y.S.2d 497
N.Y. App. Div.
1946
Check Treatment

In an action for a partnership accounting, the complaint alleged that plaintiffs and respondent were partners in the conduct of a package liquor store business, and that the license therefor was issued in the name of respondent. The complaint was dismissed on respondent’s motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and plaintiffs appeal from the order dismissing the complaint and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Carmine v. Murphy, 285 N. Y. 413; O’Connor v. O’Connor, 263 App. Div. 820, affd. 288 N. Y. 579.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Nolan, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Parise v. Pepe
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 21, 1946
Citation: 59 N.Y.S.2d 497
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.