History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pardy v. Montgomery
77 Cal. 326
Cal.
1888
Check Treatment
Thornton, J.

We cannot take notice of the affidavits in the transcript, showing, as claimed by the appellant, the circumstances under which this action was dismissed " by the court below, for the reason that it is not shown in any mode that such affidavits were used on the hearing of the application in that court.

The court below had power to dismiss the action for want of prosecution (see Code Civ. Proc., sec. 581), and there being no showing to the contrary, we must presume that the court below exercised its power properly and within the rules prescribed by law.

Judgment affirmed.

' Searls, C. J., Works, J., Paterson, J., and Sharp-stein, J., concurred.

Rehearing denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Pardy v. Montgomery
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 2, 1888
Citation: 77 Cal. 326
Docket Number: No. 11204
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.